Ecojustice Case – Healthy communities Case Status: Victory

Defending Canadians’ right to protect our environment

Julia CroomeLawyer
Josh GinsbergJosh GinsbergLawyer
Sue TanLawyer
Supreme Court of Canada
Photo by Dig deeper CC BY 4.0

Ecojustice intervened at the Supreme Court of Canada to protect Ontarians from legal intimidation by ensuring a broad interpretation of the province’s Protection of Public Participation Act.

Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (SLAPP), are used to silence those who speak out. Without laws that defend against these lawsuits, members of civil society working to protect the environment can feel a real chill from legal intimidation.

We went to court to ensure that Ontario’s anti-SLAPP provisions are applicable across a wide variety of cases and interpreted in a manner that continues to safeguard the ability of individuals and environmental group to express themselves freely on environmental issues.

Ontario’s anti-SLAPP provisions protect freedom of expression, public discourse, and allow for public participation in the democratic process without fear of retribution.

 

Why was Ecojustice involved?

We intervened in this case because public discourse is essential to any democratic society, and environmental groups — including Ecojustice and its clients — must be able to assert their views on issues of importance without fear of being unduly dragged into lengthy and costly lawsuits aimed at silencing those views.

Ecojustice has a long history of fighting SLAPPs in court and working towards anti-SLAPP law reform. Some of the most notable work has been:

  • Early in its existence, Ecojustice represented the Galiano Conservancy Association from a lawsuit by a multinational forestry corporation which is now considered to be the first lawsuit in Canada to attract public attention to the problem of SLAPPs.
  • In the mid 1990’s Ecojustice represented Friends of the Lubicon from action from Japanese pulp and paper giant Daishowa Inc. in what became known as Canada’s best known ‘SLAPP-style lawsuit’.
  • Ecojustice has been a persistent advocate for anti-SLAPP law reform. We contributed to the public debate and legislative deliberations that led to the passing of anti-SLAPP laws in Ontario and B.C.

 

What does this victory mean?

The Supreme Court of Canada confirmed in its ruling that the court will not hear SLAPP-style lawsuits unless the plaintiff can pass a rigorous test to show that it suffered real harm that outweighs the public interest in the expression of those views. The ruling upholds the purpose of Ontario’s law and will help put a stop to SLAPP-style lawsuits.

This is an important victory that affirmed Ontarians’ right to participate in environmental decision-making without facing legal intimidation.

Build the case for a better earth

Thanks to the support of people like you, Ecojustice goes to court to protect what we value most — the air, land and water that sustains all life. Make your gift today and support bold litigation for a brighter environmental future.

Join our newsletter

Get updates on the most pressing environmental issues delivered straight to your inbox.

Join our online community

Follow us on social media

60.5K

Likes


32.5K

Followers


4K

Followers