Ecojustice Blog – Nature Posted on April 15, 2014 (updated: February 17, 2015)

It’s time to put the ‘action’ back into the killer whale action plan

Margot VentonLawyer

Two years ago we celebrated a landmark win for British Columbia’s iconic Northern and Southern Resident killer whales. Now it’s time to turn our eye to practical business of protecting the whales and the critical habitat they need to survive and recover.

After years of waiting, we were pleased to see the Department of Fisheries and Oceans release its draft action plan for the Northern and Southern Resident killer whales in March. Under the Species at Risk Act, an action plan is intended to ensure the implementation of recovery measures — essentially, it’s where the rubber hits the road. An inadequate or unimplemented action plan may inevitably result in a failure to recover the species.

Unfortunately, it seems that the federal government decided to leave the ‘action’ out of its killer whale draft action plan. The result is a vague, disappointing plan that is legally and scientifically inadequate to meet four key recovery outcomes.

The terms “shipping” and “tankers” do not appear in the draft action plan at all. It’s a shocking omission, considering well-publicized plans to twin Kinder Morgan’s TransMountain pipeline and increase ship traffic out of the Port of Vancouver and directly through the Strait of Georgia, part of the Southern Resident killer whales’ critical habitat.

The plan also makes no mention of the catastrophic threat of an oil spill in the whales’ critical habitat, even though the proposed Kinder Morgan expansion would dramatically increase tanker traffic — to the tune of 400+ tankers per year — through Burrard Inlet and the Strait of Georgia.

We need to look no further than the Exxon Valdez disaster and its effects on killer whales for a cautionary tale. One Alaskan pod is the living legacy of a spill that unleashed millions of gallons of oil into Alaska’s coastal waters 25 years ago. Since surfacing in the massive slick left behind by the tanker, the pod has been unable to reproduce or recruit calves. One by one, the pod members are dying off, and scientists say the pod has no chance for recovery

Simply put, this draft action plan is not good enough. And unless concrete and meaningful action is taken to protect the whales and their critical habitat, they are unlikely to survive and recover.

The good news is that there’s still time to make it better.

That’s why Ecojustice, along with the David Suzuki Foundation, Georgia Strait Alliance, Raincoast Conservation Foundation and the Wilderness Committee, submitted extensive comments on the draft plan today.

By getting involved at this stage, Ecojustice and these conservation groups hope to help improve the plan before it is finalized. It’s not a splashy new lawsuit, but rather a subtle piece of work that requires our collective legal and scientific expertise.

We’ll be sure to keep you updated on how things progress from this point onward. After all, we know none of our work would be possible without your continued support.

Thanks for sticking with us — and we’re sure that if whales could speak human, they’d thank you too.

Build the case for a better earth

Thanks to the support of people like you, Ecojustice goes to court to protect what we value most — the air, land and water that sustains all life. Make your gift today and support bold litigation for a brighter environmental future.

Join our newsletter

Get updates on the most pressing environmental issues delivered straight to your inbox.

Join our online community

Follow us on social media